tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5385327494760659686.post3661432453114675218..comments2008-02-28T07:54:56.111-08:00Comments on Mark: "Time for Kids" - Guilty of Ron Paul censorshipMarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01419986179590727348noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5385327494760659686.post-36938257392784344312008-02-07T20:06:00.000-08:002008-02-07T20:06:00.000-08:00If the Huckster drops out it will only be Big Mac ...If the Huckster drops out it will only be Big Mac and Ron Paul!!!<BR/><BR/>Think we can get a little coverage then???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5385327494760659686.post-42512363298110599282008-02-07T16:32:00.000-08:002008-02-07T16:32:00.000-08:00Thanks for posting this. The media blackout of Ro...Thanks for posting this. The media blackout of Ron Paul is quite ruthless and I'm somewhat inclined to believe that 'Time' probably knew exactly what they were doing when they excluded him from the front cover of 'Time for Kids'. The fact that this magazine goes out to kids of elementary school age and teaches them about current affairs makes Ron Paul's omission even worse. Unfortunately, the mainstream media's exclusion of Ron Paul is widespread and now quite blatant (I've just blogged about the BBC's total blackout on Ron Paul during their 'Super Tuesday' coverage). I think that because Ron Paul's support is so formiddable and inventive (and his message is so powerful), the mainstream media have had no choice but to fight dirty to counter the 'revolution'. They don't particularly care if it's completely obvious what they're doing, because they know they can probably get away with it. It's a truly dismal state of affairs, but we should never stop exposing their lies and underhand tacticts.Vivian Empyrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04040499387822834504noreply@blogger.com